mrv3000: made by elismor (book reading)
mrv3000 ([personal profile] mrv3000) wrote2011-03-30 10:22 am

[identity profile] 2011-03-30 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I take that as a "We'll think about it. Don't call us. We'll call you..."

[identity profile] 2011-03-30 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Jonas crosses his fingers too. :)

[identity profile] 2011-03-30 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)
"General scorn." How about "specific outrage"? Thank you, Christie estate, for having more sense than Disney. They better shut this down, and fast, or there will be more than just scorn headed their way.

[identity profile] 2011-03-30 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Hopefully they'll shut it down. BAH.

[identity profile] 2011-03-30 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, please. Miss Marple is only Miss Marple when she is in her specific time period which I am currently forgetting, knitting, in St. Mary-whatsit.

[identity profile] 2011-03-30 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)

[identity profile] 2011-03-30 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Why would they even consider this? Why? Would they call it Miss Marple the early years? I hope they don't do this.

[identity profile] 2011-03-30 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Me too. It's too horrible to think about!

[identity profile] 2011-03-31 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
I liked this line: "Agatha Christie’s biographer Laura Thompson said that the author would not have been happy with Disney’s desire to mess with tradition."


Glad they're having second thoughts. May they have third, and fourth, and as many as necessary to see that this would be a TERRIBLE IDEA.

[identity profile] 2011-03-31 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
If Christie didn't like Margaret Rutherford, she'd be horrified about Jennifer Garner and this Disney-fied American nonsense. BLEH.