Captain's journal. Stardate... uh... June first…point two.

[mrv3000]

Random thought of the day: Romeo and Juliet are morons. And dead. Thank God they didn't spawn.

I'm considering more descriptive tags. I have 359 "babble" posts. But what does that mean? (Of course with that tag, it probably doesn't matter.) 469 "Doctor Who" posts. (That's actually amusingly frightening. Aren't you glad I set up the filters?) But really my only subcategories for that are "old who" (94), "new who" (266) and "squee" (58). Hmm. Maybe "episode review," "picspam" and "meta" could be added to the list. And possibly "michelle needs a time out" for those times when I fly off the handle at vague rumors.

Sorry, got distracted by other tags. Heh. I really didn't like Torchwood all that much, did I? :D And wow. I've got 9 journal entries for Star Wars. o_O

61 "melodrama" posts. Ha! Too bad it doesn't show cross tagging, as probably 55 of those are Doctor Who related...

Comments

[greenpear.livejournal.com]

And me, I've got zero tags...

[kammgirl.livejournal.com]

Leave poor Romeo and Juliet alone. LOL it would have been very hard for them to spawn as they died very quickly after they married.

[mrv3000.livejournal.com]

Tisk!

[beck-liz.livejournal.com]

Romeo and Juliet are morons. And dead. Thank God they didn't spawn.

*giggles insanely* Oh, indeed. Silly little twits.

I think with tags you can actually max out on the number of usages - or at least, there comes a point where if you're looking at one particular tag (say, mrv3000.livejournal.com/tag/Doctor Who) where you'd only be able to go back so far when you're looking at them. Which is why I started splitting major categories that I thought I'd be talking a lot about into drwho_s3 or drwho_rose or whatever.

[mrv3000.livejournal.com]

And they died because they were dumb!

[beck-liz.livejournal.com]

I actually just tested it. I could only go back as far as http://mrv3000.livejournal.com/?skip=100&tag=doctor+who - anything further got no posts.

[kammgirl.livejournal.com]

They were young and foolish, but tragically in love. The Priest was older and wiser and screwed up royally.

[beck-liz.livejournal.com]

... and post #100 only goes back to April!

*snerk* I shall stop spamming you now.

[mrv3000.livejournal.com]

Oh man. I've probably maxed out my usage on the DW tag already. Oh, yup. It only gets me as far back as this past April.

[mrv3000.livejournal.com]

HA!!! I just commented that. :D

[beck-liz.livejournal.com]

Can you tell I'm really freaking bored? :-)

The subcategories sound good, you just might want to make sure you slap a DW in front of them so they don't get mixed up with other meta/picspam/whatever. ... not, of course, that you're discussing much other than Doctor Who these days. ;-)

[mrv3000.livejournal.com]

Hmm. You've got a point about that.

Awww. I think I found my first DW post.

http://mrv3000.livejournal.com/234649.html

[mrv3000.livejournal.com]

HA! So much for not writing fic. :D

http://mrv3000.livejournal.com/234867.html

[taibhrigh.livejournal.com]

Random thought of the day: Romeo and Juliet are morons. And dead. Thank God they didn't spawn.

If you only knew how much I hated that play, you would fully understand how much this made me laugh.

[aj.livejournal.com]

Random thought of the day: Romeo and Juliet are morons. And dead. Thank God they didn't spawn.

You sounded like Lyssie right there. <3

[mrv3000.livejournal.com]

Yeah, I'm not a big fan either. :D

[mrv3000.livejournal.com]

WOO!!

And also, you are so easy now. EASY. aj. That too no time to type!

[aj.livejournal.com]

Like a $2 whore, baby!

[solielle.livejournal.com]

You know, some of Juliet's lines are actually sort of badass.

...Divorced from the context of pining and sobbing for Romeo, of course.

[mrv3000.livejournal.com]

I think my main issue is the way in which they die.