(no subject)
I went and read The Hunger Games.
The first thing I noticed was obviously the writing. I mean, first person present tense is a tough enough thing to read, but then add the sentence fragments... Fortunately I think it wound up numbing my brain around chapter 3, so I did enjoy the book in spite of the writing. (Something I'm sure every author loves to hear.)
Katniss was fairly different in the book - she was bitter, cynical and even quite shrewd. They probably thought that type of personality wouldn't play that well, so it was incredibly toned down for the movie. In watching the movie the only impression I really got from Katniss was someone who was stoic and a bit jaded. She seemed mostly bewildered by the games, where in the book Katniss was extremely familiar with them. In the book she's much more harsh, and probably a much more accurate product of her environment.
Peeta was another difference, and mainly because they chose to slightly alter the pivotal scene in their past: the whole bread in the rain thing. In the movie he came across to me as basically a dick, while in the book he seemed like a pretty good guy. I'm not sure why in the movie they showed him chucking the bread in the mud while in the book he tossed the bread to Katniss, at peril of a beating by his mother. Maybe it was all a part of trying to soften Katniss' character? If Peeta's a dick, then Katniss won't look bad for faking a relationship? Not that I think she came off badly in the book, but maybe it wouldn't quite translate in a movie? I dunno.
To me the book had a much better ending than the movie, even though they both stopped in the same place. It was the pacing of and extra insight into the ceremony and interview that I was missing in the movie. (Without knowing at the time what it was missing.) That was exactly what was needed to keep away that "oh, that's it?" feeling. Plus it got in that critical concept of the Game not really being over, which...I guess was in the movie? But it didn't really register with me when I watched it.
Anyway, I did enjoy the book and will probably get the next 2 as well. :)
The first thing I noticed was obviously the writing. I mean, first person present tense is a tough enough thing to read, but then add the sentence fragments... Fortunately I think it wound up numbing my brain around chapter 3, so I did enjoy the book in spite of the writing. (Something I'm sure every author loves to hear.)
Katniss was fairly different in the book - she was bitter, cynical and even quite shrewd. They probably thought that type of personality wouldn't play that well, so it was incredibly toned down for the movie. In watching the movie the only impression I really got from Katniss was someone who was stoic and a bit jaded. She seemed mostly bewildered by the games, where in the book Katniss was extremely familiar with them. In the book she's much more harsh, and probably a much more accurate product of her environment.
Peeta was another difference, and mainly because they chose to slightly alter the pivotal scene in their past: the whole bread in the rain thing. In the movie he came across to me as basically a dick, while in the book he seemed like a pretty good guy. I'm not sure why in the movie they showed him chucking the bread in the mud while in the book he tossed the bread to Katniss, at peril of a beating by his mother. Maybe it was all a part of trying to soften Katniss' character? If Peeta's a dick, then Katniss won't look bad for faking a relationship? Not that I think she came off badly in the book, but maybe it wouldn't quite translate in a movie? I dunno.
To me the book had a much better ending than the movie, even though they both stopped in the same place. It was the pacing of and extra insight into the ceremony and interview that I was missing in the movie. (Without knowing at the time what it was missing.) That was exactly what was needed to keep away that "oh, that's it?" feeling. Plus it got in that critical concept of the Game not really being over, which...I guess was in the movie? But it didn't really register with me when I watched it.
Anyway, I did enjoy the book and will probably get the next 2 as well. :)

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*AND I SAY THAT AS SOMEONE WHO HAS NO SIDES IN THIS TRIANGLE. REALLY.
no subject
At least that's the way it came off to me. I had no clue about him being secretly in love with her all along.
no subject
After reading the book, I loved him the most.
no subject
I think the movie made a bit of a misstep there.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And the movie did do a great job of getting that dystopian feel. Everything comes across really well as dark and twisted.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Here's the link -- Treading Water by
no subject
no subject
no subject
But I read most of the book first, so I sorta saw the movie through the PoV of book!Katniss, so I didn't notice as much of a difference between the two.
no subject
no subject
Also, I'm totally NOT a purist when it comes to literary adaptations. Don't get me wrong, I want a good, faithful adaptation, but I'm not at all opposed to tweaking and altering events for the sake of tightening up the script. Like, I know a lot of fans were upset about how they changed the way Katniss got the Mockingjay pin. Not me, though. It made sense to change that. It made sense to make that about Katniss and Prim, to reinforce the importance of that relationship. That being said, as much as I like the movie and love the cast, there is one change that I don't think I'll ever forgive them for. At the end of the book, whenever it's announced that their can only be one winner after all, Katniss drew her bow on Peeta when she mistakenly thought he was going to attack her and I LOVED her for it. And I loved how her instinctual reaction shamed her. It was such a character affirming moment for me, and I hate that the movie didn't give it to us.