(no subject)
I don't talk much about politics - I often watch it like a spectator sport. Since the neighbor woke me up at 5:30 a.m. due to their alarm going off and NOT SHUTTING IT OFF, I've been watching the news channels. First of all, hope everyone stays safe from the hurricane. But second of all, I am already sick to death of hearing about Sarah Palin and lipstick and did she have an alien baby and all the other nonsense the 24-hour news channels keep going over and over and over. This country has problems and issues and can we please goddamn talk about them?!
/end up-too-early rant
In fictional news, I watched Fringe last night. (I'm getting way too addicted to Hulu.com.)
You could TOTALLY tell this was a JJ Abrams thing since stylistically it was Lost. But story-wise it was a cross between the X-Files and CSI.
It was entertaining enough and it kept me watching, although it didn't have its hooks in me quite the way Lost did. There was some really odd pacing to it at times. One minute they'd be tracking down a suspect and the next moment they'd be having a moment or something. (I have to admit I'm glad the boyfriend turned out to be bad - whenever the two of them were together the blandness oozed from the screen. Even when they were having sex it was bland.) And there were far too many closeups of the female lead staring vacantly at something, which I think was supposed to be dramatic. Or acting. (In spite of this she makes for a decent enough main character - even though the plot has her doing some ridiculous things.) But Joshua Jackson was fun.
The science on this show was HYSTERICAL. Someone needs to explain to me how a water-based contaminant could spread through an entire plane that quickly. And what was up with the co-pilot coming out of the cockpit at a disturbance in the cabin? Okay, not a "science" thing, really, but don't cockpits stay locked nowadays? Why couldn't they have had the pilots stay locked up and land the plane instead of having a self-landing plane? *snickers* I hardly feel like I can poke at the stuff that went on in the lab though, since that's pretty much the premise of the show: fringe science. So they're going to have wacky stuff like mind-melds and stuff.
I might catch this show again, although I'm a bit iffy about it because it's already got a mytharc, and one that looks a lot like the X-Files. (Something that eventually turned me off to the show.) Big shadowy group of people using the world as guinea pigs. All they need are aliens, and who knows? They could pop up.
OH! How they used location text cracked me up. You know how normally you'll see a typed blurb at the bottom of the screen of something like "Harvard University, 9:30 a.m." They did something, um, different. The first time they did it I had to rewind it just to figure out what I was looking at. :D
Another OH! What was up with all the shots of lights? Flickering lights, people looking at lights... Heh. It will be aliens, won't it? Ones made out of electricity. Either that or it was a "we paid for lights, we're going to show you lights, dammit!"
/end up-too-early rant
In fictional news, I watched Fringe last night. (I'm getting way too addicted to Hulu.com.)
You could TOTALLY tell this was a JJ Abrams thing since stylistically it was Lost. But story-wise it was a cross between the X-Files and CSI.
It was entertaining enough and it kept me watching, although it didn't have its hooks in me quite the way Lost did. There was some really odd pacing to it at times. One minute they'd be tracking down a suspect and the next moment they'd be having a moment or something. (I have to admit I'm glad the boyfriend turned out to be bad - whenever the two of them were together the blandness oozed from the screen. Even when they were having sex it was bland.) And there were far too many closeups of the female lead staring vacantly at something, which I think was supposed to be dramatic. Or acting. (In spite of this she makes for a decent enough main character - even though the plot has her doing some ridiculous things.) But Joshua Jackson was fun.
The science on this show was HYSTERICAL. Someone needs to explain to me how a water-based contaminant could spread through an entire plane that quickly. And what was up with the co-pilot coming out of the cockpit at a disturbance in the cabin? Okay, not a "science" thing, really, but don't cockpits stay locked nowadays? Why couldn't they have had the pilots stay locked up and land the plane instead of having a self-landing plane? *snickers* I hardly feel like I can poke at the stuff that went on in the lab though, since that's pretty much the premise of the show: fringe science. So they're going to have wacky stuff like mind-melds and stuff.
I might catch this show again, although I'm a bit iffy about it because it's already got a mytharc, and one that looks a lot like the X-Files. (Something that eventually turned me off to the show.) Big shadowy group of people using the world as guinea pigs. All they need are aliens, and who knows? They could pop up.
OH! How they used location text cracked me up. You know how normally you'll see a typed blurb at the bottom of the screen of something like "Harvard University, 9:30 a.m." They did something, um, different. The first time they did it I had to rewind it just to figure out what I was looking at. :D
Another OH! What was up with all the shots of lights? Flickering lights, people looking at lights... Heh. It will be aliens, won't it? Ones made out of electricity. Either that or it was a "we paid for lights, we're going to show you lights, dammit!"

no subject
no subject
And I was the opposite with Alias and Lost for some reason. :D
no subject
I too am watching Fringe only for an actor Joshua Jackson. Didn't know Kirk Acevedo was in this until ten minutes in and I went wait a second. I would watch anything for Pacey Witter.
no subject
no subject
Pretty much the description I would give for Pacey too. And his character who I can't remember his name because he's still Pacey too me. Is a very nice mesh with the rest of the cast.
no subject
*nod*
no subject
Although, she'll probably get kicked out the second she starts cleaning her guns. :D
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
ITA
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And there TOTALLY needs to be a drinking game or something.
Hockey Mom
Mooseburger
Community Organizer
Change
Real Agent of Change
The Great State of Alaska
Family Values
Maverick
Terror
And that's just Palin. Biden will probably just start talking about how he thinks Hillary should have been VP pick.
no subject
no subject
Oh, another will be "experience" in whatever context. Also "executive experience." And probably "9-11." And many, many sentences that start out with "As a mother..."
no subject
Of course you get to drink the whole bottle if this is from Biden.
no subject
Chris pointed out last night that the best thing Biden could do as soon as he gets the mic is say "We're here as candidates for a position of public service, no more, no less. What gender or religion we are should have no bearing on this contest."
no subject
no subject
Having watched Biden for many years, I can say it will likely be a pleasure to see him clean her clock.
no subject
GAH.
Sorry. Didn't mean to spew all that out, but the "understanding special needs" thing REALLY pissed me off.
no subject
As far as the sexism, Jon Stewart really said it best with that one episode. I'm sure you know the one I mean. Well, he wasn't the one saying it, pundits and Palin herself did it for him.
You know, the whole thing with her apparently giving ultra limited interviews until she receives appropriate deference is starting to remind me of Cartman's "RESPECT MAH AUTHORITAH!"
no subject
Jon Stewart is brilliant. It's a crying shame that the most objective and informative news program out there is a comedy show.
I'm not sure it's that. I honestly think she's gone through some intense information cramming and it hasn't taken. Her interview with Gibson just proved that. And that was freaking Charlie Gibson. I think she'd end up in the fetal position, rocking and sucking her thumb in the corner, should she have to deal with the likes of Bill Moyers or the late, great Tim Russert.
no subject
no subject
BTW: When you get home (if you can deal with listening to her) here's a link to the unedited version of the "Bush Doctrine" gaffe. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NGXlsqPL2A
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
On that cheery note, I think that perhaps both you and Michelle would enjoy this clip by Craig Ferguson from a couple of nights ago: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pdRVQ4xwwmQ
no subject