Entry tags:
More Sherlock
Okay, if you've glanced in my direction in the recent past, you might know that I'm completely gaga for John/Sherlock (sexual, nonsexual, whatever). And so the latest episode gave me much squeeing.
When I posted about it, I mentioned that something felt off about the romance of Irene, but wasn't quite sure what. Honestly, I tend not to have deep thinky thoughts about shows, and sometimes can be blind about stuff.
This is a fantastic article about the failings in the writing of Irene. (Although the comments are full of douchetastic fails. I didn't get very far. Without ew-ing.)
So yeah, Irene...was problematic. I still generally liked her -- I haven't changed my mind about that -- although I wouldn't be sad if she never showed up again.
NOW SOMEONE SQUEE WITH ME ABOUT THE BROMANCE, OKAY?

no subject
Oh, comments. I've stopped reading them on public news articles because they make me sad/angry/both with only the occasional hilarity.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Okay, enough of that. *Ahem* SQUEE.
no subject
OMG THE BROMANCE. *LOVES IT SO MUCH*
no subject
In the meantime, how great was John beating up Sherlock? FANTASTIC IS WHAT THAT WAS.
no subject
BWAH! XD
In the meantime, how great was John beating up Sherlock? FANTASTIC IS WHAT THAT WAS.
*LOVES* I NEED MORE OF THEM WRESTLING!
no subject
You know I don't ship John/Sherlock but the bromance was fun. Them giggling is always an enjoyable sight.
Yeah, the romance with Irene -- there was something off. I'll have to check out that article.
I've still compiling my thoughts. I'm about halfway through writing a reaction post -- I'm about to go to work, which will give a chance to further mull over the episode (because yes, that is pretty much what occupies my thoughts while at work, my various shows, lol) -- and then I'll post later.
no subject
WOOO!
You know I don't ship John/Sherlock but the bromance was fun. Them giggling is always an enjoyable sight.
It is!!
Yeah, the romance with Irene -- there was something off. I'll have to check out that article.
I've still compiling my thoughts. I'm about halfway through writing a reaction post -- I'm about to go to work, which will give a chance to further mull over the episode (because yes, that is pretty much what occupies my thoughts while at work, my various shows, lol) -- and then I'll post later.
I'll be interested in your post!
no subject
no subject
no subject
also the article was v. good.
no subject
no subject
She has points about Irene, though I still liked her -- but if Moffat were to bring her back, my mind might rapidly be changed.
I think Moffat shrinks from emotion, always covering it with a laugh. That can work in Sherlock, and worked in Coupling (which I found funny because I was close enough in age to the characters and the interactions were painfully true at times). It doesn't work with Who, though.
But. I love John/Sherlock, love the bromance and could watch that for hours. This episode reminded me why I like much of Moffat's work, even if he's disappointed me lately.
no subject
But the bromance! I LOVE IT SO. I can't wait for Hounds!
no subject
I am glad the mainstream media isn't completely oblivious to Moffat's problematic portrayals. Sometimes it seems like it's just our small part of fandom plugging away, while the rest of the world heaps praise on him.
no subject
Anyway, I just read this which was really good!
http://www.socialjusticeleague.net/2011/09/how-to-be-a-fan-of-problematic-things/
no subject
no subject
no subject